NIFLA v. Becerra: The Most Important First Amendment Case

NIFLA v. Becerra: The Most Important First Amendment Case

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” – First Amendment

On March 13th one of the most important cases concerning the freedom of speech was argued before the United States Supreme Court, NIFLA v. Becerra.

The central issue at stake, in this case, is whether the government can compel organizations and individuals to share a message that is fundamentally in opposition to the organization’s purpose or an individual’s belief. 

In 2015, AB 775, the Reproductive FACT Act, was passed in California. The FACT Act mandated both licensed and unlicensed pregnancy resource clinics (PRC’s) to post large signs with information about abortion and contraception services provided by the state.

AB 775 is about freedom of speech and pushing a pro-choice agenda. This can be seen in the fact that 98% of the clinics subject to this law are pro-life. Compelling PRC’s to share about abortion in such a detailed manner is wholly against the PRC’s purpose.

It was argued that the reason for the law is that pro-life PRC’s are manipulating women into a carrying out an unwanted pregnancy. 

During a visit to a pregnancy resource center, however, the woman is counseled on all of her options. Even abortion is discussed. While these resource centers hope the woman will choose to keep her baby, they do not force her into a decision, and they will support her after regardless of her decision.

Josh McClure, a pregnancy center director, said this law will “require us to use our walls as a billboard to promote abortion.” 

The case was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 13th. Attorney, Michael Farris, arguing on the behalf of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) said: “A government that tells you what you can’t say is dangerous, but a government that tells you what you must say—under threat of severe punishment—is alarming.”

Should the United States Supreme Court Justices deliver an opinion in favor of the California law, the first amendment as we know it will be no longer exist with the same power and protection it has afforded the American people for centuries. The opinion from the Supreme Court is slated to be published sometime in June. Let’s hope the Justices keep the First Amendment intact and protect our freedom to speak or not speak certain messages.

Over 105,000 Signatures Gathered in Effort to Stop Taxpayer Funding of Abortion In Oregon

Over 105,000 Signatures Gathered in Effort to Stop Taxpayer Funding of Abortion In Oregon

As of March of 2018, over 105,000 signatures have been collected for the initiative effort to stop taxpayer funding of abortions in Oregon.  This, the 4th such attempt by pro-life group Oregon Life United (OLU), is the closest they have gotten to the required 117,578 signatures the group has achieved.  OLU is attempting to collect 150,000 total signatures to account for any disqualified signatures.

If successful in the signature gathering stage, the initiative will give Oregon voters the opportunity to weigh in on the issue in the November election.  Oregon Life United’s leaders have high hopes that this year they will be able to stop taxpayer dollars from funding abortion.

On average, 10 abortions per day are paid for by Oregon taxpayers.  In Oregon, even late-term, sex-selective abortions are publicly funded.  With the passage of House Bill 3391 by the Oregon Legislature last year, taxpayer funding of abortions was further expanded to undocumented immigrants.

Oregon Life United founder, Jeff Jimerson, first began his effort to stop taxpayer funding of abortion in 2012 by creating Oregon2012, a non-partisan, non-denominational political action committee (PAC).  Its mission was to pass the state’s first-ever law to protect women and babies from abortion. 

Jimerson believed the best way to fulfill the mission of Oregon2012 was to start a ballot initiative. This requires a certain percentage of registered voters to sign a petition that they want the proposed legislation to appear on the ballot. Once done, the ballot measure will receive a public vote in the next election.  In this case, the initiative language would change the state constitution to prohibit public funding of abortions.

When Oregon2012 began their ballot initiative to qualify for the November 2012 election, volunteers from all over Oregon began to collect signatures. However, only 72,000 of the required 117,000 minimum were collected. In 2014, Jimerson and the team tried again, this time collecting 98,000 signatures.

Discouraged from the multiple defeats, but optimistic about the gradual increase of signatures collected each year, Jimerson tried again. The groups most recent attempt brought on a wave of pro-abortion opposition. Several pro-abortion organizations including Planned Parenthood, NARAL and others, made a lengthy court appeal which blocked Jimerson’s group from gathering enough signatures in time. Determined to stop taxpayer-funded abortions, Jimmerson filed the petition again for 2018 as Oregon Life United.

Although 105,000 signatures is a significant milestone, there are only three months remaining for petitioners to gather the remaining quota.

To qualify for the November ballot, a total of 117,578 valid signatures must be collected before the June 30th deadline. OLU’s goal of collecting 150,000 signatures is a frequently used strategy for initiative efforts in Oregon in order to avoid disqualifying the effort because of too many signature errors.

“I’m confident we can get it done,” says Jimerson.  To learn more about Oregon Life United’s petition, go to www.StopTheFunding.org.

The Cause of Death that is not Reported

The Cause of Death that is not Reported

This past January, the Statesman Journal published an article highlighting the top 11 causes of death for Oregonians in 2016. These causes and total deaths included: 

  1. Cancer 8,076,
  2. Heart disease 6,976,
  3. Unintentional injury 2,108,
  4. Chronic lower respiratory heart disease 2,081,
  5. Stroke 1,944,
  6. Alzheimer’s disease 1,786,
  7. Diabetes 1,240,
  8. Alcohol-related 829
  9. Suicide 771,
  10. High blood pressure 557,
  11. Firearms 510

While these numbers are horrific and far higher than desired, there is a secret cause of death not mentioned in the Statesman Journal’s article.

The cause of death: abortion. In 2016 the Oregon Health Authority recorded 8,942 abortions. This startling number reveals more babies were killed from abortion that year than those who died from cancer. On average over 22 babies were aborted every day in Oregon. This injustice must be stopped.

There is hope. In the past 5 years, abortion rates have been going down. Since 2012, Oregon’s average abortion numbers have gone down by 909 babies. You can be a part of that change. Help abolish abortion today by becoming an advocate ORTL.org.